Wednesday, February 14, 2018

REZULTATE FEBR. 2018

For those who failed, please note the format and acceptable (identitty construction) theme as per webpage instructions:
· Final written assignment. The final written assignment is a 6-page critical essay. In order for the essay to be taken into consideration it must: 
a) be based on preliminary negotiation of the theme, the approach, the format and the structure of the argument, 
b) have a clearly stated theme, approach and structure, 
c) comply with the style of an academic critical essay (references, bibliography, editing etc.). 
Please note that the theme has to deal with the (construction of a) cultural identity of a (national/ethnic etc.) group and the approach must be derived from the area of discourse studies (rhetoric, pragmatics, DA/CDA, power and discourse etc.) and/or political/ideology studies. Work in the form of personal essay, editorial journalism, historical overview will not be taken into account. "

Feel free to contact me if you have any questions.

NUME
PREZENTE
ACTIV SEMINAR
ESEU FINAL
NOTA CATALOG
OBSERVATII
BUDURU TEODORA
7
5
4
FAIL
not in keeping with the format and identitarian theme I requested
CERCEL DENIS
6
8
4
FAIL

CERCEL RALUCA
5
5
?
FAIL
lacking seminar assignments
CHIRICĂ MIRUNA-IOANA
6
8
4
FAIL
not in keeping with the format and identitarian theme I requested
COZMA GEORGIANA-MIRUNA
6
8
8.00
8

DIDULESCU DENYSE
5
10
6
8

HAGIU ȘERBAN ANDREI
5
8
7
8
disjointed argument, little connection with the subject matter of this class; occasionally, the author's attitude to Hitler seems ambiguous.
HAIMED LINA-DANA
4
5
4
FAIL
not in keeping with the format and identitarian theme I requested
IAMANDI ANCA
5
10
9
10

ION CRISTIAN MIHAI
5
8
6
7
not in keeping with the format and identitarian theme I requested
IONAȘCU THEODORA
5
5
5
6
unclear argument, self-contradictions, unscientific sources.
MĂCĂNEAȚĂ ANDRA
4
8
4
FAIL
not in keeping with the format and identitarian theme I requested
MALCIU CLAUDIA-MARILENA
1
5
?
FAIL
failed in the 1st exam session (poor attendance); to resit the exam, you must write an additional 3-page-long essay to compensate for poor attendance
MICLĂUȘ ANDREEA MARIA
7
8
7
8
too much history, too many clichees, not enough personal processing and case analysis.
MANSOUR GHUFRAN AIJAD
5
5
4
FAIL
hardly any personal contribution in this essay; not in keeping with the format and theme I requested
NEAGU MAGDALENA IRINA
4
5
4.5
5
replete with serious language mistakes, nor really proving control of any of the approaches studied in this class.
NICA ALEXANDRA
1
5
?
FAIL
failed in the 1st exam session (poor attendance); to resit the exam, you must write an additional 3-page-long essay to compensate for poor attendance
NIȚĂ ELIZA
6
5
8.5
8

NIȚĂ LORENA
2
5
?
FAIL
failed in the 1st exam session (poor attendance); to resit the exam, you must write an additional 3-page-long essay to compensate for poor attendance
PANARIU IRINA-ELENA
4
8
?
FAIL
lacking seminar assignments
POSTICA VICTORIA
1
5
?
FAIL
failed in the 1st exam session (poor attendance); to resit the exam, you must write an additional 3-page-long essay to compensate for poor attendance
TOMA MIHAI
7
8
9.5
10

ULIANOV IOANA
4
8
9
9

VELOIU ALEXANDRA
7
8
?
FAIL
no final essay

No comments:

Post a Comment